Seasons Wellness Clinic

From The Doctor’s Desk: The Moral of the Story? Hormone Balance Key To Reducing Breast Cancer Potential.

Dr. Nathan Goodyear

Dr. Nathan Goodyear

I have four kids that range in age from four to eleven. One of my favorite things to do is read them a great story. So today, let’s talk about some very important stories and the moral each one presents.

The story about breast cancer potential has more characters than just estrogen and progesterone as we discussed in my last post. There are other hormones that are integral characters in that story also. As you will learn in this post, the moral to the breast cancer story is balance — balance between all the hormones in your body.

The Story On Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) — Say That One Three Times Fast!

DHEA, a testosterone precursor, is a hormone produced by the adrenal glands and plays a part in breast protection. DHEA plays an important role in supporting the immune system. DHEA stimulates the production of good T-helper lymphocytes-1 and their associated good cytokines: interferon, Interleukin-2 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-beta. This is in contrast to the bad T-helper lymphocytes-2 and their bad cytokines. DHEA levels typically decline as we age. The decrease in DHEA levels are inversely correlated with increasing age-related disease. The strength of this correlation is yet to be determined, but the decline in immune system due to low DHEA is clear. So where does that leave DHEA? Individuals with low DHEA levels have more disease, and in this case, more breast cancer. The moral of this story? Low DHEA = a compromised immune system = breast cancer vulnerability.

Awake Is the New Sleep album coverThe Story On Melatonin — The Sandman Hormone.

Melatonin is the hormone that regulates your sleep cycle. It is produced from the pineal gland in the brain. Low melatonin levels have been linked to breast cancer through the additional benefits of melatonin. Melatonin boosts the immune system, decreases estrogen and progesterone production, and acts as an anti-oxidant. Bench studies (non-human studies) have shown significant increase risks of breast cancer with low melatonin levels. Can you guess what happens as we age? Yes, you guessed it. Our melatonin levels fall. Ever talk to a post-menopausal woman? Most women of that age have sleep-related complaints. The moral of this story? Low melatonin = a compromised immune system = breast cancer vulnerability.

The Story on Thyroid — The Energy Hormone.

How about the thyroid hormone?  The breast cancer link reaches to all hormones and everything seems to involve the thyroid these days! T4 (or better known as synthroid, levoxy, levothryoixine) is one of the most prescribed medicines today. But T4 is a very weak thyroid hormone. In fact, the body is looking for T3, a result of T4 to T3 conversion. The problem is that many individuals don’t convert T4 to T3 well. (Very often I see patients who have been on synthroid for years without symptomatic improvement even though their “levels” are said to be “good”.  I digress. That’s a subject for another post. Let’s get back to the breast cancer link.) Low T4 and T3 levels result in low sex hormone binding globulin levels (SHBG). SHBG is how some hormones are transported. When SHBG levels drop, the free availability of the hormone it transports goes up. In this case, the levels of free estradiol go up. Remember the negative breast implications of estrogen dominance from last weeks post (link)? The moral of this story? Low thyroid = low SHBG = high estradiol = estrogen dominance = breast cancer vulnerability.

The Story On Insulin — The Sugar Storer

Finally, Insulin. Insulin’s primary role is in the storage of glucose. However, due to the large percentage of simple or refined sugars in our diet, insulin resistance has become a major epidemic, and, yes, insulin resistance increases the risk of breast cancer. How, you ask? High simple sugars leads to insulin resistance and PCOS (Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome). As a result, estrogen dominance and excess testosterone are produced which leads to weight gain. Remember that fat cells produce even more estrogen and estrogen stimulates breast cell growth (link). Young women will start their cycles at an earlier age and thus will increase their lifetime exposure to estrogen without appropriate progesterone balance. And to make matters worse, traditional therapy with birth control pills for these young women increases the breast cancer risk even further. The moral of this story? Insulin resistance = estrogen dominance = breast cancer vulnerability.

Change The Ending Of The Story.

Just because any of these hormone deficiencies might produce in you symptoms which you recognize in this post doesn’t mean that you are going to have breast cancer. However, the sooner you seek hormone balance, the quicker you are going to lower your breast cancer vulnerability/potential. As you can see, the hormonal symphony is what is important. Balance! When your hormones are balanced, the result is a symphony, and in turn, your body is in tune and makes beautiful music. But when your hormones are not balanced, then…well, you know the ending of that story. pink ribbon

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

From The Doctor’s Desk: Hormone Imbalance A Contributing Factor In Breast Cancer

Dr. Nathan Goodyear

Dr. Nathan Goodyear

Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) increases breast cancer. Have you read headlines like that? Or perhaps you were told that HRT caused someone’s breast cancer.

Do hormones really cause or lead to breast cancer? Think about this: every women continues to produce hormones, even after menopause. So, it cannot be that hormones in and of themselves cause cancer. Scientific evidence indicates that synthetic hormones and hormone imbalance do contribute to breast cancer.

The ABC’s of Estrogen.

Estrogen’s effects in the body are regulated through two different kinds of receptors: alpha and beta receptors. Estrogen-alpha receptors stimulate breast cell growth. Estrogen-beta receptors inhibit breast cell growth.

  • Estradiol, the most potent estrogen, equally stimulates alpha and beta receptors = growth stable
  • Estrone, the second most potent estrogen, stimulates alpha receptors 5:1 over beta receptors = pro growth
  • Estriol, the weakest variety of estrogen, actually stimulates beta receptors 3:1 = growth inhibitory

The key element here is balance of hormones. Higher levels of estrone present in your body (produced by fat cells) result in more breast stimulation. Higher levels of estriol present in your body results in less breast cell stimulation and, therefore, breast protection. Estriol = Good. Estrone = Bad. If you have heard of someone developing breast cancer after starting Premarin, there’s a logical explanation for that. Guess what Premarin is loaded with? Premarin contains (48%) estrone (estrone = bad = breast cell stimulation).

Here are some more ugly facts about Premarin, also know as conjugated equine estrogen. Premarin actually decreases estrogen beta receptors. So, if you take Premarin, then you are taking high doses of estrone (estrone = bad) and decreasing your estrogen receptors that inhibit breast cell growth. In a nutshell: you are taking more of the bad estrogen and decreasing your amount of the good estrogen. This equates to a prime set up for breast cancer.  Don’t take my word for it. See the wonderful article by Kent Holtorf.

Progesterone: The Growth-Inhibitor Hormone

The confusion out there about estrogen and breast cancer is bad enough, but the confusion is even greater on the subject of progesterone.

Pregesterone is the key hormone in the second half of a woman’s cycle. Estrogen is the dominant hormone in the first half of your cycle (estrogen = growth = growth of the uterine lining to support implantation of an egg). The counteractive hormone to this growth phase is progesterone (progesterone = no growth = sloughing off of the uterine lining). It’s the amazing and fascinating way that woman was created.

progesterone-vs-provera

Synthetic progestins, often prescribed, are NOT the same as the progesterone your body produces. Just look at the structure and you see that they are not. The one thing they do have in common is they both protect the lining of the uterus against excessive estrogen growth. But, that is where the similarities end.

While there are many differences between the two, our focus here will be on the difference in breast cancer potential. Simply stated, synthetic progestins are pro-breast cancer and bioidentical progesterone is breast protective. The Women’s Health Initiative (link) revealed a 26% increase in breast cancer as a result of taking synthetic progestin. The Nurse’s Health Study (link) found that synthetic progestins tripled breast cancer risk over that of estrogen only. The use of Provera, a synthetic progestin and component of Prempro, has been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer by 800%!

The statistics for bioidentical progesterone are the opposite. Bioidentical progesterone has many positive breast benefits:

  • Progesterone decreases estrogen production
  • Progesterone moves estradiol to weaker estrone
  • Progesterone moves estrone to inactive (sulfated) form
  • Progesterone moves estrone to weakest/safest estriol
  • Progesterone down-regulates estrogen receptors all together
  • Progesterone activates the cancer protection gene, p53

The idea that progesterone is a safer alternative to synthetic progestins is not new at all.  As early as the early 80’s, there has been a call for safer progesterone over synthetic progestin counterparts. In 1981, nearly 30 years ago, L.D. Cowan showed that just having low progesterone levels increases the risk of premenopausal breast cancer risk 5.4 times.

Unfortunately, progesterone-deficient states, (or estrogen dominance) are very common in women today as a result of many factors: being overweight, PCOS, environmental xenoestrogens, excessive estrogen therapy, and perimenopause. Another study, showed progesterone to have a 400% decreased breast growth rate.

The Scientific Evidence Is Clear.

The evidence in the scientific literature is clear with regards to estrogens, progesterone, and hormone balance.

  • Bioidentical and synthetic hormones should NOT be used interchangeably. They are not equal. They have very different physiologic effects on the breast:  synthetic progestins (Provera notably) increase breast cancer (800%) and bioidentical progesterone protects against breast cancer (400% decrease breast growth rate).
  • Estrogen therapy is not for everybody and is definitely not a panacea drug; in fact estrogen dominance is a major contributor to breast cancer risk. But if estrogen therapy is needed, then estriol (Estriol = good) is the best.
  • Hormone balance is the key. Without estrogen and progesterone balance, a women’s cycles are irregular, and infertility can be a big problem.
  • You know, once we understand hormones and the balancing cycle between estrogen and progesterone, it makes perfect sense that imbalance would cause breast problems. And the scientific evidence indicates just that. In honor of Breast Cancer Awareness Month, it’s time make sure your hormones are balanced and protect yourself from breast cancer.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    From the Doctor’s Desk: Think Pink — It’s Breast Cancer Awareness Month!

    Dr. Nathan Goodyear

    Dr. Nathan Goodyear

    I love the change of seasons. I particularly love fall in the South. The oppressive heat of summer gives way to crisp, cool mornings, green leaves give way to brilliant colors, and college football returns.  But, October is even more special than that. October brings attention to one of the greatest fears of women — breast cancer.  October is Breast Cancer Awareness month.

    There is much to be excited about in the arena of breast cancer treatment. Earlier detection, minimally invasive surgery, and high survival rates head the list. Credit needs to be given to the great work of many organizations like the Susan G. Komen Foundation and many researchers and physicians around the world.

    But, breast cancer has not given up.

    Let’s look specifically at the most current statistics of breast cancer. The lifetime probability of women developing breast cancer (2003-2005) is 1 in 8.  That amounts to about 185,000 women annually. Breast cancer accounts for 27% of all cancers in women. Breast cancer accounts for 15% of all cancer deaths in women and is the second leading cause of death due to cancer in women — only surpassed by lung cancer.  Pink Ribbon

    The statistics are not all bad. Breast cancer has decreased by 27% from 1990 to 2005. Five-year breast cancer survival rates are improving — 91% for Caucasian women and 78% for African-American women.

    Weight contributes to breast cancer risk. Since 1960, the percentage of obesity has risen from 16% to 36% (2006). That means that 1/3 of the female population is obese. What a disturbing trend! And even worse, the trend of breast cancer has paralleled the obesity trend in women.

    Here are the current Screening Guidelines:

    • Yearly mammograms starting at age 40
    • Clinical breast exam every 3 years for women in their 20’s and 30’s; annually after 40
    • Self breast exams should begin in early 20’s

    The focus in breast cancer today is on early detection and treatment.  At Seasons, we want to focus on prevention. Why ever let the cancer develop in the first place. Follow us over the next couple of weeks as we focus on how.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    From the Doctor’s Desk: Research Shows Vitamin D Insufficiency Linked To Cancer

    Dr. Nathan Goodyear

    Dr. Nathan Goodyear

    Inadequate sunlight exposure has been linked to many cancers. (Click here for article.)

    • Breast
    • Colon
    • Ovary
    • Prostate
    • Bladder
    • Esophagus
    • Kidney
    • Lung
    • Pancreas
    • Rectum
    • Stomach
    • Uterus
    • Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma

    Recent research suggests that vitamin D therapy can prevent cancer.  Another article suggested that Vitamin D levels greater than 55 ng/ml would prevent 60,000 cases of colorectal cancer and 85,000 cases of breast cancer in North America. The same article projected that 250,000 cases of colorectal cancer and 350,000 cases of breast cancer world wide would be prevented each year.  In fact, the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition recently showed a 77% reduction in breast, ovarian, colorectal cancers as well as lymphoma and leukemia just by normalizing the amount of Vitamin D in a patient’s body.

    Vitamin D Therapy Another Cog In The Wheel of Wellness.

    I practice Integrative and Functional Medicine and this research supports my approach. By replacing exactly what the body needs, in this case Vitamin D, my patients can improve their bone health, improve symptoms in a myriad of other conditions, and possibly even prevent cancer in their bodies. No anti-depressants, no relaxants, no harmful medications, and no side effects. Our focus is treating the cause of symptoms and, as a result, providing true health and wellness.

    Related articles by Zemanta and others:

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Phytonutrients…What Are They?

    Fruits and vegetables are good sources of anti...

    Phytonutrients are nutrients found in plants that may affect health positively. The health benefits found in these nutrients include decreasing the risk of heart disease and cancer, improving glucose control in people with diabetes, and much more. A few examples of phytonutrients are: carotenoids, flavonoids, lignans, phytosterols and stanols, and some vitamins. Each phytonutrient is found in varying amounts in whole grains, fruits, vegetables, legumes and nuts.

    Phytonutrients function by:

    • Serving as an antioxidant
    • Enhancing the immune system
    • Altering estrogen metabolism
    • Causing cancer cells to die
    • Repairing DNA damage

    Eating a wide variety of colorful fruits and vegetables and replacing refined grains with whole grains will ensure you are getting the beneficial effects of these powerful phytonutrients. To learn more, contact our office and schedule an appointment today.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Bioidentical Hormones: What Does The Scientific And Medical Evidence Say?

    Dr. Nathan Goodyear

    Dr. Nathan Goodyear

    A young lady came into my office the other day to discuss hormones. She was a breast cancer survivor. Her concern, and rightly so, was her risk of getting breast cancer again. Since she lived in the south (our main office is in Ruston, Louisiana), she had experienced the women’s ritely passage of menopause: “the hysterectomy ceremony.”

    Her question to me was: can she take hormones? Years ago, her cancer doctor had placed her on premarin, telling her that it was safe. She also was told that because she had a hysterectomy, progesterone was not necessary. Her gynecologist, in contrast, told her she couldn’t take premarin. Different doctors, different opinions.

    Garden with some tulips

    Image via Wikipedia

    I’m not trying to offer a third opinion here. I just want to stay focused on the evidence. That is what evidence-based medicine is all about. Unfortunately, market forces are clouding evidence-based medicine today.

    In earlier posts, I’ve talked about progesterone, synthetic progestins and their polar opposite effects on a woman’s breasts. Progesterone lowers risks. Progestin increases risks. I want to get a little more specific today with some information from an outstanding review of the evidence. In Dr. Kent Holtorf January 2009 article, the Bioidentical Hormone Debate, he exhaustively reviewed 196 research articles. (If you aren’t up to reading the full article, you can read an abstract of the review.)

    Here is my summary of the risks associated with synthetic progestins:

    • increased breast cell growth
    • increased conversion of weaker estrogens into more potent estrogens
    • promoted the formation of toxic estrogen metabolites (16-hydroxyestrone)
    • stimulated the conversion of inactive estrogen to active estrogen (estrone sulfate to estrone)
    • had anti-apoptotic effects. (Apoptosis is programmed cell death: which is a way to control cancer growth. Anti-apoptosis means your body lacks this method of controlling cancer growth.).

    Contrast this with the benefits of the natural bioidentical hormone progesterone.

    • reduced breast cell growth by 400%
    • downregulated estrogen receptors in the breast
    • induced cancer cell apoptosis (programmed cell death that helps control cancer growth)
    • reduced breast cell division and growth
    • and in some studies, progesterone actually arrested human breast cancer cells.

    After looking at nearly 200 independent studies, Dr. Kent Holtorf concluded that “Both physiological and clinical data have indicated that progesterone is associated with a diminished risk for breast cancer, compared with the increased risk associated with synthetic progestins.” Studies have shown that synthetic progestins increase the risk of breast cancer:

    1. by approximately by 25% for each 5 years of use
    2. by triple the risk (67%) of breast cancer when added to estrogen therapy
    3. double the risk to 4% per year when compared to estrogen therapy alone.

    This is in stark contrast to bio-identical progesterone, which reduces the risk of breast cancer by 10%.

    “As far as the east is from the west”—that is how different the effects of progesterone and synthetic progestins are on the breast. Holtorf concludes his article in Postgraduate Medicine with statements like this: “With respect to the risk for breast cancer, heart disease, heart attack, and stroke, substantial scientific and medical evidence demonstrates that bioidentical hormones are safer.”

    In my next post, I’ll look at synthetic premarin versus bioidentical hormone estrogen.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Why you should be concerned about estrogen dominance

    Breast Cancer Ribbon by MesserWoland

    October is breast cancer awareness month!

    Last week, in a post about three ways to help prevent breast cancer, I talked a little bit about estrogen dominance. You’re probably wondering what it is and why it matters.  I’ll do my best to explain this as thoroughly as I can without getting too technical.

    What is it?

    Estrogen dominance occurs when you stop ovulating. During the first half of a woman’s cycle, estrogen stimulates growth of her uterine lining. Half way through the cycle, ovulation occurs. At this point progesterone production dominates-which limits further estrogen growth.  Without ovulation, progesterone does not balance the estrogen produced in the first half of the cycle. Instead, a woman’s body continues to produce estrogen resulting in estrogen dominance.

    When does this occur?

    Estrogen dominance can occurs for several reasons.  First is when young teenagers start their periods. They often have irregular periods for the first two to three years because of lack of ovulation. Second is during perimenopause (the transition to menopause). During perimenopause, a woman again stops ovulating and stops producing progesterone to balance estrogen. Finally, estrogen dominance occurs in women who have polycystic ovarian syndrome. This syndrome is a collection of hormonal symptoms that have at their root cause, lack of ovulation and thus estrogen dominance.

    Why is this important?

    Estrogen dominance during the perimenopause puts women at a greater risk for weight gain and breast cancer. High levels of estrogen can lead to constant stimulation for growth. This means all estrogen is encouraging all cells to grow-normal cells and abnormal cancerous cells in the breast.

    What can we do about estrogen dominance?

    During perimenopause, the simple addition of bio-identical progesterone can balance the estrogen. This corrects estrogen dominance, helps women lose weight, and reduces the incidence of breast cancer.

    (Special thanks to MesserWoland for providing copyright permission of the pink ribbon through Wikipedia.)

    Three easy ways to help prevent breast cancer

    Breast Cancer Ribbon by MesserWoland

    October is breast cancer awareness month!

    Here’s the sad truth about breast cancer treatment. Despite billions of research dollars committed to the cure of breast cancer, the death rates due to malignant breast cancer have not changed. For one-third of women who are diagnosed with malignant breast cancer, the disease will be fatal.

    Instead of waiting for breast cancer, how about working to prevent it all together? Treatment is important, but prevention is even more important.  So that’s where we should focus our efforts.  Let’s be proactive about breast cancer and not merely reactive.

    Let’s start young.  If a girl starts birth control pills when she is younger than 18, she triples her lifetime risk for breast cancer.  Women who have their first child before 24, decrease their lifetime risk by as much as five times.

    Let’s think about nutrition.  Yes, what you eat affects your weight and your risk of breast cancer.  A diet high in trans fatty acids, partially hydrogenated oils, sugar, refined carbohydrates but low in fruits and vegetables provides a favorable environment for cancer growth.  Additionally, high exposure to Xenoestrogens (pesticides and hormones) in non-organic foods can provide a favorable environment for cancer growth.

    Let’s talk about “estrogen dominance.” When a woman stops ovulating, the decreased progesterone in her body will promote unregulated breast tissue growth. Decreased progesterone leads to estrogen dominance. It occurs in menopausal women, overweight women, women with the rapidly increasing diagnosis of polycystic ovaries, and all young girls in their first 2-3 years of menstruation.

    These are three easy steps women can take to avoid letting their bodies become a favorable environment for breast cancer.

    1. Proper nutrition and use of organic foods
    2. Elimination of birth control pills except for contraception
    3. Correcting estrogen dominance with progesterone

    Let’s be proactive, not just reactive.

    (Special thanks to MesserWoland for providing copyright permission of the pink ribbon through Wikipedia.)

    October is Breast Cancer awareness month

     

    Breast Cancer Ribbon by MesserWoland

    We at Seasons want to clear the air of some of the confusion related to breast cancer.

    No cancer or disease is more feared by women today. Breast cancer is the number one cause of cancer related deaths among women of the ages 18 to 54. Breast cancer is the number one overall cause of death among women ages 45 to 50. It’s no wonder we fear it.

    But here’s what those numbers mean? A women’s lifetime risk of developing breast cancer is 1 in 8. The number of breast cancer cases have increased by more than 40% from 1973 to 1998. Breast cancer deaths account for 15% of all cancer related deaths in women.

    “Of course,” you’re saying to yourself, “the many billions of dollars in research mean we have better cures now, right?” Unfortunately the answer is no. Over the last 50 years, the mortality rate of malignant breast cancer is unchanged. One in three women with malignant breast cancer still die.

    Much talk and money has been spent on treatment of existing breast cancer. In some ways, these dollars have not provided much return on their promises.

    But look again. The research has given tremendous insight into the causes of breast cancer. That’s why so many clinics like Seasons are focusing on those causes. We believe in prevention.

    Don’t misunderstand. We need to keep funding the research. Keep racing for the cure! In the meantime, you can do your part to help prevent breast cancer before it ever shows up. At Seasons, we can show you how.

    (Special thanks to MesserWoland for providing copyright permission of the pink ribbon through Wikipedia.)

    My doctor said I have HPV, human papilloma virus.

    So you’re probably wondering, “What is the human papilloma virus?”

    The human papilloma virus, known as HPV, is the known causative agent in genital warts and abnormal pap smears.

    There are many different types of the HPV. Types 6 and 8 cause genital warts. The other types of HPV, particularly 16 and 18, are known to cause abnormal pap smears and 70% of cervical cancers. HPV also has been linked to 35-50% of vulvar and vaginal cancers.

    HPV is sexually transmitted. A new HPV vaccine is available for women 9-26 years of age for the prevention of diseases related to types 6, 11, 16, and 18.

    Unfortunately, the vaccine is not effective for active disease.

    Next Page »

    Seasons Wellness Clinic